Welcome to Shannon Babcock Landmark Realty Sign in | Help
Often the cause of conflict, rules around smoking in a condo building are set to become an even HOTTER ISSUE.

CHILLIWACK REAL ESTATE NEWS

 

 

With people more aware of the health dangers of second-hand smoke, there are more conflicts between smokers and non-smokers in strata corporations. Marijuana is also causing conflict. In fact, with the growing acceptance of medicinal marijuana, it may soon be smoked more openly.

Provincial Legislation

The B.C. Tobacco Control Act (TCA) bans smoking in common areas of condominiums and within three metres of a doorway, window or air intake of common areas. The TCA requires strata corporations and their property managers to enforce the smoking ban. Failure to do so is a contravention of the Act.

Some municipalities in BC have bylaws that are either similar to, or more stringent than, the TCA. Strata corporations should check their municipal bylaws to determine whether the bans are limited to the areas specified under the TCA or are broader.

Because the TCA only deals with tobacco products, it cannot be used to prevent smoking of other substances such as marijuana. Although it is illegal to smoke marijuana under the federal Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, the extent to which it is enforced varies from municipality to municipality. As a result, a strata corporation or condo resident cannot rely on the government statutes to ban marijuana smoking in a strata corporation.

While the BC Strata Property Act (SPA) does not address smoking directly, condo owners may ban smoking by bylaw or rule. Because smoking bans under the TCA or a municipality’s bylaws must be enforced, a strata corporation should consider creating a no-smoking bylaw that mirrors or goes beyond the legislation. Without its own bylaw, a strata corporation may be limited in its ability to enforce government-imposed smoking bans.

Building-Specific Bylaws

Even without a specific bylaw, a strata corporation may have other bylaws to limit smoking. For example, the standard bylaws to the SPA provides that an owner, tenant, occupant or visitor must not use a strata lot or common property in a way that is a nuisance. Nuisance is defined as an unreasonable interference with the use and enjoyment of land. If a complaint about smoke is made, the strata council must investigate the complaint to determine whether it is a nuisance. The investigation may involve hiring an expert or going to the “scene.”

If smoking is found to be a nuisance, it is unlikely the smoker will comply with a complete ban. As a result, a negotiated solution that minimizes transfer of smoke (such as renovations to the strata lot and its ventilation system) may be required. However, according to the Clean Air Coalition of B.C., air filters, purifiers and ventilation systems do not eliminate second-hand smoke. Consequently, the repairs may not be effective and other solutions may need to be found.

Enforcing the Rules

Ultimately, if the problem continues, the strata corporation will have to enforce its bylaws by levying fines or denying access to a recreational facility in accordance with the SPA. If these measures do not work, the strata corporation may have to apply for a court injunction to ban smoking or if the smoker is a tenant, an order to evict the tenant. An owner that fails to abide by a court injunction may be found in contempt of court proceedings and be forced to pay a fine or go to jail. Alternatively, the strata corporation could apply for a court order to force the owner to vacate the strata lot.

If the strata corporation fails to enforce the bylaw, an owner has two remedies. An owner may apply to court for an order to force the strata corporation to enforce its bylaws. Alternatively, an owner may bring a claim under the Human Rights Code that the strata corporation has discriminated by failing to provide a smoke-free environment, which the owner requires because of a disability.

While there are examples of human rights complaints by non-smokers, there are very few cases brought by smokers. Where marijuana is involved, the alleged discrimination is often on the basis that smoking is required for medicinal purposes to treat a disability.

The negative effects of second-hand smoke are now well documented. The demands of non-smoking residents conflict with a smoker’s desire to smoke in the comforts of their home. The strata corporation is obliged to resolve these conflicts. A proactive strata council will take the necessary steps to avoid costly legal action.

- See more at: http://www.rew.ca/news/how-to-handle-smoking-conflicts-in-strata-buildings-1.2156538?rew.ca/news=rew.ca/news#sthash.ARIsSrpO.fWYHVjfM.dpuf  

‪#‎strata‬ ‪#‎condoliving‬ ‪#‎chilliwack‬ ‪#‎harrisonhotsprings‬ ‪#‎HopeBC‬
‪#‎mls‬ ‪#‎realestate‬ ‪#‎REW‬

Comments

Anonymous comments are disabled